So did Mamiya. Pentax is a lot more healthy. -Adam
Tom C wrote: > Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did > have a respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to today? > > > Tom C. > >> From: jtainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >> To: "pdml@pdml.net" <pdml@pdml.net> >> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s) >> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:18:18 -0600 (GMT-06:00) >> >> "645 bodies and lenses are gone from the Pentaximaging web site. If the >> 645d does return it will be a large scale "New" Product introduction. >> Something I don't think Pentax has the chutzpah to carry off. Nor do I >> think they have the production capacity to meet any kind of real demand >> for new 645 lenses. Hell they can't even keep up with demand for K mount >> lenses." >> >> All true, but B&H still list a number of 645 lenses, most in stock. > Pentax's immediate challenge would be some normal and wide-angle 645 > lenses, and they already have a new normal lens on the lens map. >> Joe >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
