No. On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:37 AM, Tom C wrote: > No. But I read publicly available industry reports and news items > and am > referring to what I read. Good enough? > > Tom C. > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next >> camera(s) >> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:49:10 +0000 >> >> Tom, >> You know Hoya management? Can you introduce them to the rest of us? >> Paul >> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> May be, but relative comparisons like that don't necessarially fly >>> with those holding the purse strings. >>> >>> I just can't see Hoya management, more pragmatic than the former >>> Pentax mgmt., going down a risky road with a 645D. >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> On 10/19/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> So did Mamiya. Pentax is a lot more healthy. >>>> >>>> -Adam >>>> >>>> Tom C wrote: >>>>> Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades >>>>> and did >>>>> have a respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to >> today? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tom C. >>>>> >>>>>> From: jtainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next >> camera(s) >>>>>> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:18:18 -0600 (GMT-06:00) >>>>>> >>>>>> "645 bodies and lenses are gone from the Pentaximaging web >>>>>> site. If >> the >>>>>> 645d does return it will be a large scale "New" Product >> introduction. >>>>>> Something I don't think Pentax has the chutzpah to carry off. Nor >> do I >>>>>> think they have the production capacity to meet any kind of real >> demand >>>>>> for new 645 lenses. Hell they can't even keep up with demand >>>>>> for K >> mount >>>>>> lenses." >>>>>> >>>>>> All true, but B&H still list a number of 645 lenses, most in >>>>>> stock. >>>>> Pentax's immediate challenge would be some normal and wide- >>>>> angle 645 >>>>> lenses, and they already have a new normal lens on the lens map. >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>> above >>>>> and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>> above and >> follow >>> the directions. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>> above and >> follow >>> the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
