John, I'm keeping all written below because I never delete my "sent" 
mail and I want the infor there... :)

I agree on several points with you about dark backgrounds, especially 
for color images...
I think they look better often, the black background is definitely 
easier on MY eyes,  and your
point about using less power to display is interesting - I just never 
thought of it...
A different matter in print altogether.  

I have my default colors on my computer set so that most things I look 
at (like this mail I'm writing now and
the background in photoshop and Word ) is a slightly bluish gray... just 
about  anything but white works for me...

One of the things I liked about smugmug was their carbonite theme 
display I use in almost all the galleries I have there.
Glad Wheatfield clued us in on why your grays turned to electric blue.  

I read this email of yours before I saw the other ones you had written 
on the subject, I did look at those two
htmls you sent .  sometimes cyberspace can be sooo annoying!

ann


John Celio wrote:
 (quoting Bob W in this passage...)

>>However, it doesn't really matter about the difference, and it's not
>>Ann's eyes that are at fault. The important thing is that you're using
>>one of the combinations that every design guide recommends against
>>because of its inherent illegibility. In general it's a better idea to
>>have dark text against a lighter background. Think about the number of
>>books and magazines you see with black pages and light print, and ask
>>yourself if you'd want to read something printed like that.
>>    
>>
>
>I've found I much prefer dark backgrounds to light ones, but perhaps I have 
>somewhat sensitive eyes.  I have read that white on black can be hard on the 
>eyes, but I did make my text a gray tone to make it less contrasty, and I 
>think that helps a lot.  ffffff on 000000 is really hard to look at, I 
>agree.
>
>There are two main reasons I chose black as my background color:
>
>1. Photos tend to look better on a dark background when shown on the 
>internet (IMHO).  There's less glare around the image to screw with the 
>apparent presentation of the photo.  I also picked gray tones for my text 
>and links to reduce glare.  Photos often look very different (to my eyes) 
>between my dark website and my bright livejournal, which has a white 
>background.
>
>2. Darker websites use less monitor power to display than bright ones, so 
>it's a tiny contribution towards reducing power consumption and, thus, 
>climate change.  May sound silly, but it means something to me.
>
>Anyone have any ideas about why my lovely gray colors aren't showing up 
>properly in Firefox?
>
>John
>
>--
>http://www.neovenator.com
>http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto 
>
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to