Bettter than ugly tatooed girls badly photographed in cheap underwear. I like the bokeh. The pose wasn't the best of the shoot, but I wanted to show the only frame I shot at 1.8.
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Stenquist" > Subject: PESO: f1.8 > > > > It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp > > image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash > > from the 540 with a softbox attachment. > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222 > > Sucky bokeh. Bob pointed out that the bokeh on the pictures of the macro > lens that was posted here a couple of days ago was bad, and they were also > taken with an FA50/1.4. > It's to bad, because it is a nice portrait length. > The pose is pretty contrived and her right hand are REALLY badly placed. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
