> 
> From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/11/07 Wed PM 05:37:10 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: f1.8
> 
> Concerning the photo of the "rare" lens:
> 
> When doing technical photography (which is what this actually is) sharpness 
> is paramount. The entire item(s) of interest should be tack sharp. If 
> extranious OOF items are desired for "artistic effect", this should be done 
> with proper placement of the OOF items out side the DOF that completely 
> covers only the item(s) of interest. Note: Acceptable DOF for technical 
> photography is often tighter than that for other types of photography.
> 
> Regards,
> Bob...
> ------------------------------
> "Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!"
>   -- Guess the author!

Edmund H. North.

> 
> From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >>> It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on to deliver a sharp
> >>> image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8, 1/800th, fill flash
> >>> from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
> >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
> >> ...
> >> Does anyone know whether Voigtlander 58 1.4 has better bokeh?
> >
> > I don't think anyone here has had the pleasure to work with one yet.
> >
> > Personally, I'm not very enamored of this particular photo. The
> > model's pose and the odd out of focus rendering do not strike me as
> > terribly appealing.
> >
> > The OOF rendering looks like what happens when you are imaging with
> > too wide a lens opening, focused at too close a distance. It would
> > look smoother and more appealing with the lens stopped down a bit.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to