On Nov 15, 2007 2:36 AM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bong, Like I mentioned in my another reply on the same matter, the wider > lens could've been more interesting for #45. But then I would have to > struggle with redundant objects... > > Your comment about #44 leaves me profoundly intrigued. What hmmm does it > mean to be profound?
Oh... My first reaction was that its abstract simplicity may be a metaphor for something or has a deeper meaning, but then maybe it is simply a case of WYSIWYG and nothing more. :-D Bong -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
