Tom C wrote:

>>>, and to get it right one must see.
>>>      
>>>
>>Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities.....
>>    
>>
>
>Certainly, one would have confidence.... but that confidence does not negate 
>human error or the fact that the camera itself is not a perfect device.  The 
>ability to see a captured image immediately after exposure, is to a 
>photographer, probably the single largest advantage offered by the technology. 
>
>Tom C.
>
>
>  
>
I can only get a hint of what Ive done from the tiny photo.. although it 
is sufficient to trash the really obvious
out of focus, super camera shake, subject out of frame stuff.. ...  LIke 
Robb, I need to look at them on the
big screen to really tell what I've gotten.  

And using the button that zooms in  on the camera really messed me up 
once when I went to the next frame
to examine it after zooming in on one.  I was photo'ing a little birdie 
on a roof -- shot about 10 frames -
thought I had gotten it but all I was seeing on back of the camera was a 
piece of the sky -  cursing myself
and trashing a bunch I sudden realized I was only looking at a corner of 
the frame.  ugh.  Probably didn't
have a decent shot anyway. sigh.

ann


>
>
>  
>
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: A question about chimping
>>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:36:00 -0600
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Tom C"
>>Subject: Re: A question about chimping
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>, and to get it right one must see.
>>>      
>>>
>>Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities.....
>>    
>>
>>>You're right, it's a hallmark of many pro's to check and review their
>>>images on the spot in order to correct deficiences, and in the past they
>>>spent thousands of dollars for the capability with duplicate backs,
>>>polaroid film, and in some cases duplicate bodies.
>>>      
>>>
>>Polaroids were almost exclusively used in the studio to check lighting and
>>whatnot, and often that was to satisfy art directors, not the
>>photographers themselves.
>>
>>William Robb
>>
>>
>>--
>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>[email protected]
>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
>>the directions.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to