You're forgetting the most infamous one of all. The Takumar 135 F2.5. We used to have regular arguments on the list about whether or not it was worth spending even $25 on one. I had one but gave it away. ;-)
>>> ".timber>>code" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2007 11:31 AM >>> Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens? Thanks, ..t -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. !SIG:47430c8c82761686796348! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
