Waay to much trouble to use film for this one. You'd have to scan all the images, and that might lead to some disparity. I would definitely use digital. With one lens of course. A fixed focal point and established parameters for color temp and exposure. I'd pick a landmark that wouldn't move to mark the edge of frame. I'd shoot of a tripod and mark the tripod mount location. Don't make it difficult. For a moving picture you definitely don't need any higher res than what a 6 megapixel camera can deliver. Paul On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Hello List > I may be offered a chance to make one (two, actually) shots every > week or > so, for a period of perhaps 6-8 years. Thats perhaps 52x8 (416) > shots For > the harbour project in my home town. Perhaps you remember that I'm > a city > planner/architect working for the local community. > We're buildnig a new 40 ha harbour on topof a 4.000.000 ton soil > deposit. > I'll arrange for two stationary tripods (steel and concrete) to be > installed > at different places. So the camera position is not really an issue. > The > result will be a small movie (30 seconds?), showing in seconds how > the whole > thing was built during a 6-8 year period. My question is: What kind of > camera equipment would you use, in order to make sure all shots ar > compatible - same angle of view, same colour rendition etc. > I was thinking of 6x6 equipment (Pentacon or Hasselblad) and 120-film > (bought in advance and stored in a freezer). > What do you guys think ? > > Regards > Jens Bladt > > http://www.jensbladt.dk > +45 56 63 77 11 > +45 23 43 85 77 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
