On 11/24/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David J Brooks"
> Subject: Proccessing observation, Pentax - Nikon, to quick prints
>
>
> > Probably nothing earth shattering, or not alreeady known, but i;ll share
> > this.
>
> >
> > Wonder why i have to do a  lot of post process with the older Nikons ,
> > not so much with the D200, and i rarley have to do anything with the
> > K10D shots.
>
> The Pentax definitely does a better job at file processing. I was doing a
> mini seminar at the studio a while back to show the crew the entire
> photography experince from capture to print.
> I was using my K10, whey were using mostly D70s and a D200. The first thing
> we noticed was that the Pentax produced jpegs were nicer to print than the
> Nikon produced files, and I thought the pictures looked nicer too.
> The Nikons will produce a lot more of them in any given time frame though.
> We just sold a huge portrait of a young couple and their 2 dogs which I shot
> with the K10, and was gorgeous, and had a nicer look than the display prints
> shot with the Nikons under similar lighting.
> I suppose that I am often using the A*85/1.4, and the Nikons always seem to
> have zooms mounted might have something to do with this also.

Maybe, ut all of the files i proccesed/printed we're with the 16-45.

I use the Nikon 70-210 F2.8 VR. I hope thats not the case. Thats not a
$400 zoom.:-)

Dave
>
> William Robb
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>


-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to