Thanks for the clarification! It's interesting ... that's three comments on this list preferring more DoF. Comments from other lists haven't mentioned it at all.
I photographed this scene both at f/3.5 and at f/11 as it was hard to tell in the viewfinder or LCD which one would do what I wanted: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48ba.htm To my eye, the deeper DoF loses the dimensionality I was after and becomes a little too planar. I wished I could have gotten just a little bit more blur, a little shallower DoF. Very interesting what appeals to other eyes... !! :-) Thanks for all your comments. best, Godfrey On Nov 25, 2007, at 7:40 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Godders - he means the out of focus reed in the background - top right > bothered me, too. > > I liked your little free verse intro , though > >> Thank you for your comment. >> Can you be more specific? I'm not sure I understand what you mean. >> >>> Don't care much for the out of focus ones... >>> >>>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48b.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
