I dunno about that. The 1DsmIII is pushing the limits of what 35mm glass is capable of. While a ~22MP 645D wouldn't necessarily compete well (Although the Mamiya ZD back is selling every unit Mamiya can push out, at a similar cost to the 1DsmIII) a higher-rez unit might well be competetive, and there's a lot more resolution headroom with good MF glass.
-Adam On 12/4/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An interesting user review of the new Canon 1Ds MkIII, which confirms my > feeling that the 645D was swimming upstream without the spawning > possibilities... > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/mada-iiis.shtml > > I would consider this very bad news for an eventual 645D if it were ever > introduced. > > -- > The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the > difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football > team. > > -- P. J. O'Roarke > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
