Even though she got paid - if she didn't sign a model's release it would mean to me she would not have wanted those pictures circulated.
Especially since she was naked. Leave it alone and apologize to her ann William Robb wrote: >A couple of years ago, I partook in a little photo contest based on >the "Naked in the House" concept. >Of course, I won (using a Nikon to boot). >Some of you may remember the pictures which, until very recently, were >on my website..... > >Anyway, some internet hero mentioned to the model that I had pictures >of her on my website, and the shit hit the fan. > >So, for the moment, the images are off my website pending my deciding >if I am going to be an ass about it. > >Now, here's the deal: The Regina Shutterbugs camera club hosted the >event, and hired the model. I paid a sum of money to participate. I >did not sign any paperwork (release) at all regarding the event or the >pictures derived from it, other than to sign the cheque. >My take on it is that I own the images and can use them for any non >commercial purpose that I deem appropriate, including spreading them >all over the world if I decide that such poor taste is appropriate (I >just might on this one). > >Opinions? >Preferably opinions that are relevant to Canadian law > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
