B&H Photo probably gets a huge volume discount and you guys are paying a VAT included in the list price IIRC where as our sales taxes are added on later.
David J Brooks wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007 11:04 AM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David J Brooks" >> Subject: Anyone using the DA* 50-135 F2.8 >> >> >> >>> Just curious if anyone has picked one up yet and has any comments. >>> >>> I have been looking at this, and its well received at Pentaxforums dot >>> com, however i notice a $300 price difference form Henrys and B&H. >>> >>> Whats the point of having a dollar at par.??:-) >>> >> I tested one just after they arrived in Regina, and was very tempted, but >> I'm holding out for the 60-250 at the moment. I think for me it will be the >> better lens. >> >> The dollar on par is a transitory thing, don't get too used to it. The >> Canadian economy is too dependant on having our dollar worth quite a bit >> less than the US one. >> > > True. > > Now i see Camaera Canada is $500 more than B&H.?? > > Dave > >> William Robb >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > > > -- The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football team. -- P. J. O'Roarke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
