I can match my monitor almost exactly, allowing for some difference in backlit conrast vs. a print. My monitor is calibrated, and I use the Epson ICC profiles with the recommended paper on an R2400. I can almost always nail it with one print. I used to struggle with a printer and monitor whose calibrations didn't match. Now, I can't imagine working that way. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > William Robb wrote: > > > I've never worried overly if my prints match my screen, I don't think it is > > possible. I've seen screens that the photographer swears is a match for his > > output, and just chucled at how far away it is in reality. > > Well, you'd probably chuckle at mine, then. :-) Honestly, though, mine > has been close enough just using Adobe Gamma to get the monitor > somewhere in the right continent and the Epson-provided Stylus Photo 820 > profiles with Epson papers and inks. > > Before Gamma and the profiles, getting a decent print that was even > close to the screen image was basically pointless. After them, it's > been a no brainer. At least to my untrained eye. > > -- > Thanks, > DougF (KG4LMZ) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
