On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2007 2:25 PM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Boris, I really think some reviews (rare ones) are truely useful,
>> complete and objective as one can be.
>> However DpReview (notthe onl site of course but it is very good
>> example) typically proves the guys running it are either incompetent
>> (which I beleive) are a lot more interested in the revenues the site
>> generates (also the case for DpR).
>
I decided their "reviews" are useless as reviews a long time ago.
They're good at enumerating and comparing published specifications between
different brands/models, but that's about it. Their choices on test shots
are rather poor (JPEG? Kit lens?), although this recent one appears to
use a good prime and RAW.
According to them, *EVERY* camera they "review" is a must-buy,
great camera.
-Cory
--
*************************************************************************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
* Electrical Engineering *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
*************************************************************************
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
