On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:34:31 -0500 Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 18, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Polyhead wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:53:56 -0500 (EST) > > Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Polyhead wrote: > >> > >>> I also refuse to use jpeg, png or nothing. > >> > >> Wow. That's bizarre. > > > > Hardly, jpeg is lossy compression. It grabs a square of pixels and > > averages them, you lose both dynamic range and resolution with > > jpeg. PNG is lossless and opensource. The other problem with jpeg > > is that because of the way it handles compression, it chokes on > > film grain. There isn't a way to feed a jpeg encoder a image with > > allot of film grain and have it spit out a reasonable result. > > People use it because they just don't know any better. > > If you want to try to appear intelligent, you might want to learn how > to spell "a lot." If you pay more attention to how something is said rather than what is being said, then there is no need for me to bother with you. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Ben 'Polyhead' Smith KE7GAL -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
