I believe the only differences between it and the FA are the cosmetics
and maybe the coatings.
John Whittingham wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:33:55 +0200, Roman Melihhov wrote
>
>> Your comments/opinions about Samsung D Xenogon 35mm f2.0 would be
>> appreciated. It looks like smc FA 50mm only thinner. I wonder how it
>> performs in the field.
>>
>> Thank you...
>>
>
> Is it not a re-badged FA 35/2?
>
> John
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in
> error please notify Carmel College
> on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.
>
> Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email
> attachments for viruses we cannot
> guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any
> responsibility for viruses.
>
> Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for
> inappropriate content, the college cannot
> be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
> The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel
> College cannot be held
> responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
--
I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati.
A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated.
When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world
-- Anonymous
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
