Marnie, the thumbnails are huge too. Just hogging bandwidth for something which should just make you think it might be worthwhile to download the actual image. It's like embedding a PSD or uncompressed Tiff file, in a web page, or even using a full size jpeg for the thumbnail, sure the full size image loads instantly when you click on it, but it defeats most of the purpose to using a thumbnail, without that advantage.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 12/18/2007 11:03:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Way way way too slow to wait for the page to load. > > G > > ========== > Yeah, by the time the picture had half loaded I had lost interest. So didn't > seem them. Not a good idea to have thumbnails at the bottom, they have to > load too. Better to have thumbnails on one page, larger pictures on their > own > pages. > > HTH, Marnie aka Doe > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > > **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes > (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) > > -- I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world -- Anonymous -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
