In the real world, you have to sometimes adjust your thinking to the level of the people around you. I don't expect you accept that, it took me decades to do so myself.
However, I will comment on your photos. The are technically excellent, and boring as hell. The sort of thing someone who has taken a class or two on photography produces. Certainly not worth the time and effort it took to look at them. You photo typify why I normally do not comment on photos. They all fall into the boring, interesting, or gut-grabbing categories. All too often the technically excellent photos seem to be in the boring category; I suppose that is because they are do for the photography's sake rather than the pictures sake. The urge for technical perfection often gets in the way. Graywolf Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com Blog: http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Polyhead wrote: > > Well, the comments were about the way i choose to operate the website, not > about the photo. As its my site, i'm entitled to operate it any way I wish. > People insist that PNG is not suitable for web images, it is. They insist i > pay for hosting and conform to questionable EULA agreements. How am I > suppose to see anything but inferiority in that attitude? You would have to > be compleatly stupid to agree to photobuckets EULA. Basically, you post it > there, they own it. Thats a big stick they can come hit you with, 10, 15, 20 > years down the road. The fact is, when it comes to websites and image > formats, i probably DO know more about them than most of the people here. > Rather than assume I know what i'm doing, they make the assumption me using > PNG was some sort of mistake rather than intent. Their loss really. I can > do better. With freinds like that, who needs an enemy? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
