>The large-aperture and longer focal lenght tele-lenses > are very modestly represented by comparison.
Ya think cost may have some bearing on this ? Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "AlunFoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Recently Accepted for the Pentax Gallery > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> I noticed a shift away from nature and landscape in recently accepted >> images after our conversation here. I wouldn't be surprised if >> someone from Pentax Gallery reads the list. Immediately following our >> conversation I submitted a pic of Grace blowing bubbles that had >> previously been rejected. It was accepted. We may very well have >> alerted someone to what was obviously a bias. >> Paul > > ... Or the debate influenced a substantial number of voters. Which > probably is a much easier thing to do. :-) > > A while ago I posted a Q to PDML and DPreview, asking if people voted > if they didn't submit anything. At the time, some of my pics had been > in the queue for nearly 3 weeks which was unusual. After my post, it > took 10 hours to get rejects on most of them. One or two stayed on, > and got accepted a few days later. > > With re. to wildlife, btw, the most used lens seems to be the FA- and > F- 300mm f/4.5. The large-aperture and longer focal lenght tele-lenses > are very modestly represented by comparison. > > Best, > Jostein > > -- > http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ > http://alunfoto.blogspot.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
