If he has a career, he has a manager and a lawyer, dealing with it.
He's off fishing. That's what flunkies are for...
frank theriault wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 1:05 PM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Adam Maas wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I suspect the issue here is not libel, but rather the unauthorized use
>>> of Chuck's name to make a profit (Which is potentially legally
>>> actionable, it's the profit issue, not the distribution that makes the
>>> case.). This is the same reason why model releases are needed for
>>> Commercial Photography.
>>>
>> That was my assumption also: That they're going for a trademark
>> violation, essentially.
>>
>
> Okay, you guys are right, that's what he's suing for (as it appears in
> this report, anyway).
>
> I still say he has no chance of doing anything other than settling for
> an undisclosed sum (meaning both sides walk away paying their own
> legal fees, while saving face).
>
> If Chuck had any sort of a career, he'd have better things to do with his
> time.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
>
--
I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati.
A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated.
When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world
-- Anonymous
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
