I suspect they'll settle for a nominal amount. The model obviously knew they weren't filming this for their personal use. I would think that there's some implied consent working here. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Seems to me that the moral outrage part is simple hype, (I expect the > model didn't object and knew exactly the impression she was making). > The real issue here is the failure to obtain a model release. I expect > that will cost them. > > Bob Sullivan wrote: > > Oh well. I watched the video - nothing X rated, nothing even R rated. > > PG13 at worst. > > Looks like the model got cold feet about the shoot afterwards. > > Should have those model releases signed! > > Regards, Bob S. > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 12:15 AM, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> <http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=341780> > >> > >> If true, someone at the ad agency stuffed up royally. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >> follow > the directions. > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. > A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. > When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world > -- Anonymous > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
