Have you compared either of the DA* lenses to their FA* predecessors?

On 1/5/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see people complaining about the 16-50/2.8 on DPReview a lot too.
> But people there seem to complain about every insignificant thing all
> the time. If something does not perform precisely as they want or
> erroneously presumed it ought, then it's obviously faulty and you
> have to whine about it.
>
> I have used just the one DA*16-50/2.8 lens that is being provided to
> me on loan. It seems to be a superb performer although I admit that I
> continue to prefer using the DA14, DA21 and FA43 in this focal length
> range instead. Fast wide-to-portrait-tele zooms are big and clumsy to
> me.
>
> I find the 21 and 43 to be my favorite people lenses, most of the
> time, and both work well in low light ... I'm not afraid to use ISO
> 800 or 1600 when needed. If I were shooting more event/photojourno
> type stuff, yes: the DA*16-50 would be on the camera more of the
> time. Even though I don't like the bulk of it.
>
> Most of my photos in these circumstances seem to float around a 35 to
> 40 mm focal length, or down in the 20-28 mm range, when using a zoom
> depending upon the specific circumstances of the event.
>
> Godfrey
>
>
> > David J Brooks wrote:
> >> Good points. I had considered the 1.5 crop, but loosely.:-)
> >>
> >> I thought about the 16-50 f2.8, but i get conflicting stories. Here
> >> most seem to like the lens. Over at Pentax forums, a lot seem to have
> >> problems with it.
> >>
> >>> To my mind, the 43mm is a bit tight for social event photography.
> >>> Group shots in limited space will be tough. Remember that's an
> >>> FOV comparable to about a 65mm lens in 35mm, nearly portrait
> >>> length. I think the 35/2 will serve you better. Before I'd spend
> >>> the money on a 43 limited, I'd ante up a bit more and get the
> >>> 16-50/2.8. That's the type of zoom most high-end wedding
> >>> photographers use for working a reception. It would be ideal for
> >>> your purposes here.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to