Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:18:22 +0100 schreef P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually my reading is that Boz says he thought it was rumor, but since > he actually held a release product box with the dedicated hood, and the > hood itself, is pretty sure that +/-5 exist as a released product, but > he can't be 100% positive. A bit better than rumor but a bit less than > beyond a reasonable doubt. That's what he writes, yes. I was exaggerating a bit, of course. Nevertheless, I can easily imagine that Pentax already purchased a batch of hoods for the lens. If the lens were cancelled at the last moment, they would be sitting somewhere in a warehouse, with one 'getting lost' after a while. Until someone owns up, we'll never know... Ciao, Lucas > Lucas Rijnders wrote: >> Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:28:05 +0100 schreef P. J. Alling >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> That's not what it says... >>> >> >> It says the hood exists but the lens is only a rumour. That's pretty >> close >> to what I said, isn't it? >> >> It would be nice if Pentax would take this up again, and develop a DA >> 35/1,4 hood. A fast normal hood is missing in the line-up <grin> >> >> >>> Lucas Rijnders wrote: >>> >>>> Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:36:36 +0100 schreef Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 18/01/08, Cymen Vig, discombobulated, unleashed: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone have a spare 35mm 1.4x-S rear converter? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> never mind that does anyone have a 35mm f1.4 :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Leica, Canon, Minolta, Nikon... According to the KMP Pentax just made >>>> a >>>> hood for one ;-) >>>> >> >> > > -- Ciao, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
