In a message dated 1/18/2008 8:17:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Love the idea of this type of shot. Well seen and exposed. It's actually a shame that there wasn't (I assume) a way to include the base of all the trees on a consistent plane, relative to the bottom of the frame. While it may appear to have at least been possible, I would imagine your eye would have insisted you give it your best effort. The image stands on its own very well, Bruce.
Jack ========= What he said. To me, it would have been better if the base of the right most trees (and what appears to be fallen branches) were included. Then it would have been a great shot. As it is it is still a *very good* shot. Lovely lighting and tones and seeing through the trees to more trees. Nice one. Marnie aka Doe :-) --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A stand of trees right next to the coast. They grow just above the > sea cliffs. > > Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 135mm > ISO 200, 1/125 sec @ f/5.6, handheld > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5612bw.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce --------------------------------------------- Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
