It's hard to objectively justify the added cost of the K20D over the K10D. I have a K10D but the added features of the K20D sure are attractive. The biggest single plus is probably the increased file size, allowing bigger print size without loss of quality. But the other new features sure are pulling @ my wallet.
Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PK20D presentation >I didn't buy a K10, the resolution increase wasn't enough to tempt me > and most of the other improvements though nice, didn't really enhance my > shooting style, so I was waiting for a the price to drop. It just about > hit my buy point when the K20 was being bandied about, so I decided to > wait and see what it looked like. Now I'm going to have to find the > money to buy a K20. > > cbwaters wrote: >> I was pretty meh about the new camera but that presentation was very >> appealing. I' kinda want one now. Not that I'm going to get one. I'll >> probably have to wait until the K40 or 50D to justify a new camera. >> He didn't mention the 20FPS burst mode either... hmmm. >> Honestly, I'd like a much better noise situation with the high ISO >> shooting >> in the K10 (the *istD was better here) but other than that, the K10 is >> great >> for me so far. >> >> CW >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Timber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:46 AM >> Subject: PK20D presentation >> >> >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
