There is one other thing about the "standard fare" shot that detracted, but probably only for me. That is excessive building clutter. Just too many structures.
Jack --- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > >The second one probably should have made it. The lighthouse, on the > > >other hand, is a great shot but standard fare. > > I agree. > > I think the second one didn't make it because it's a pano (or at > least > much wider than 2:3 aspect ratio). IIRC, they said at the beginning > they wouldn't accept panoramic photos. (I like to think that's why my > > photo of the Royal Crescent in Bath was rejected!) > > > >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/elephantseals_0003a.htm > >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0739-07b.htm > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
