I'd vouch for it too. I used it extensively while touring Egypt, and have no complaints. BTW, the kit I took only included it and the 50-200, and I probably shot over 70% with the 16-45. Those monuments are damned big!
Both lens performed extremely well, as did the *istD. Still working through the pics, though... John Coyle Brisbane, Australia ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:47 AM Subject: Re: DA 16-45 zoom > I've found it to be very good. I use it extensively for all kinds of work, > including some commercial and event > photography. I tagged a couple of pics that I have posted on the web. The > Chrysler engine and the Challenger are > probably pretty close to full wide, while the Ford engine is close to the > 45mm end of the range. > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4015908&size=lg > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3672858&size=lg > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2829588&size=lg > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Steve Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Does anyone own one of these? I was playing with one today at the >> local camera store and am toying with buying one. Are they any good? >> >> -- >> >> Steve Sharpe >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
