----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: In the same Pop Photo Issue...


> William Robb wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jack Davis"
>> Subject: In the same Pop Photo Issue...
>>

>> As soon as the film is scanned, the comparison becomes irrelevant. Scanning 
>> introduces a lot 
>> of
>> issues such as grain aliasing and other artifacts. When someone makes an 
>> optical print and
>> compares it to a digital print, then they are making a valid comparison.
>> Having said that, I would be very surprised if a 35mm film print of any 
>> speed of film would 
>> look
>> as good as a print from a 14mp SLR shot at the same ISO.

>>
> Define "good".
>

In this context, grain and overall look of the image.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to