Thanks for the comments about the Len's (and Stan's) web site which I posted in beta version on my kc.rr.com site a few days ago.
I think I have now corrected those glitches that were pointed out to me, plus some others that weren't. I have moved the new version to the primary site, concentric.net. If you find any broken links or other major issues, please let me know. If there are formatting difficulties (but it still works ok) I would like to know just because I have a lot to learn about how the HTML code reacts on different systems with different browsers. But I won't spend much time mixing cosmetic stuff; now that I have the content up-to-date, I am working on a "new look" for the site. For those who haven't seen this before, what I am referring to is the site at <www.concentric.net/~smhalpin>. Starting with January (or June?) 1997, I have read the discussions on this list about Pentax lenses, extracted the portions that seemed cogent to me, and assembled those comments into the referenced website. I have further edited the comments so that there is a "brief" comments section and a "Long" comments section. At this point, if you print the LongComments as is, you'll have 150-200 pages of material (depending on the font size you choose). It is at about 350k on the server. If you print the brief comments, that is at about 40 pages. If one were to scroll down through the Long comments, it would take between 200 and 600 "page down" commands (depending on browser, screen and window size, etc). Which is a major reason why I am going into a redesign; it has grown way beyond the point where anybody would ever want to actually scroll the whole thing. Enjoy, let me know if here any substantive problems with content or operation, and I'll keep working on presentation format. ¡Salud, amor, dinero, y el tiempo para gozarlos! Stan - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
