My apologies. You're right of course. That is the headline of the article. I read only the body copy. It's interesting in that headlines are frequently written by someone other than the author. Again, my mistake. (Slapping self: Wake up!) Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My subject line was the headline of the article as presented, Paul. I > did not intend it to mean anything other than to identify the piece > as it was published on MSNBC.com. > > Of course, it's a bit sensationalist ... as are most headlines in > this horrid infotainment world of marketing pap and spin we live in > today. ;-) > > Godfrey > > > On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Interesting, as far as it goes. And relevant in regard to > > journalism and crime photography. I think your title misleads a > > bit. The article speaks of restoring the credibility of a > > photograph -- that is, developing a method of determining that a > > photo hasn't been altered when that is important. It says nothing > > about restoring "photography's credibility." But I suspect that > > distinction was inadvertent on your part. > > Paul > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I thought this article published by Anick Jesdanun of the Associated > >> Press an interesting read. > >> > >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23342630/ > >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
