Looks to me like the plain of focus is quite different. At all ISO settings, the K20D "dust.." can and closer objects are especially good. Noise in the darker areas quite acceptable.
Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, it looks quite good. And he doesn't say what level noise > reduction he used on the K20D. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/184452-post1.html > > > > Really not that bad. The 40D is a bit better, even at 1600 I do not > > see much of a difference. > > The ISO3200 is clearly better on the 40D. > > > > -- > > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille > > ---------------------- > > Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... > > Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB > > Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow > > the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
