Nice capture. A little less centered would be better.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: K10D + DA* 16-50 report with samples


>I finally got a couple of hours to take my new K10D and DA* 16-50 out into
> the field.  I took some shots of Oak trees on the eastern edge of the
> Sacramento valley (along Ione Road south of Hwy 16).  Here's a sample:
>
> http://www.westerickson.net/misc/ValleyOak.jpg
>
> This started out as a DNG raw.  I pulled it into Photoshop CS2 with pretty
> nominal settings, then used the channel mixer to convert to black and 
> white.
> I did not apply any Photoshop sharpening.  I thought that it was pretty
> impressive at first glance--sharp, clean, and with good dynamic range. 
> The
> image in the link is a straightforward downsize with no subsequent
> sharpening.
>
> So I went pixel-peeping.  Here are 100% crops of the lower left corner,
> center, and lower right corner:
>
> http://www.westerickson.net/misc/LeftCenterRight.jpg
>
> To me, the grass on the right is noticably "mushier" than the grass on the
> left.  I've looked at a few other images and I see the same kind of
> behavior.  I guess this is the dreaded "decentering" defect.
>
> Also, when I shoot near the long end of the zoom, the autofocus is very
> accurate.  When I try to autofocus on distant objects at 16mm, the camera
> seems to immediately "give up" and default to about 10 feet (3 meters) or
> so.  Autofocus seems ok for nearer objects.
>
> I'll have to mount this lens on my *ist-Ds to see if it's a K10D thing.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Mark


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to