I can't see any banding in the normal view and a bare hint of it at 100%. The 6400 output looks just as good as the excellent output from my D300.
-Adam On 3/6/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from > the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in > the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the > image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at > 6400 would probably end up as BW. > Paul > On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That's banding? > > > > Yes it is. > > > > >> Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal > >> viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at > >> 1600. But to each their own. > >> Paul > > > > > It's clearly visible at the normal view so it's not a good thing. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave > > > > >> On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Owen LaPrath wrote: > >> > >>> The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots > >>> starting at > >>> iso1600. > >>> I have even seen it in iso800 shots! > >>> Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :) > >>> > >>> later > >>> Owen > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > and follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
