Adam Maas wrote: > Not to mention it includes a aperture ring. If you go in for that sort of thing...
Adam Maas wrote: > On 3/11/08, Jim King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Susan (Jens) wrote on Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:41:11 -0700 >> >> >> > Thanks a lot, Paul, Ken, Adam and John. >> > I'm glad I seem to have made a good choise. >> > Also the Tamron is lighter and smaller, but of cource doesn't go >> > with my >> > MZ-S, which I very rarely use :-) >> >> >> Ah, but it *does* work just fine on a film body. In this case, the DI >> designation only implies that it has been modified (probably with >> extra/better coating of the rear element) for use on digital. The >> image circle covers a 24x36mm frame completely. >> Regards, Jim >> >> > > Not to mention it includes a aperture ring. > > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
