Boris Liberman wrote: > Thanks, Derby... > > Purely theoretically, as folks in my local camera club say, to tell the > difference between the lenses one has to look at A3 (A4 is marginal) > size prints... But I digress... > > As for your shots. It seems that K50 has slightly more pronounced soft > effect around the contrasty edges while A50 comes across a tad sharper. > However, it could be attributed to the minute differences in the way you > focused them... > > I shall await arrival of my K50/1.2 with great anticipation. Local folks > told me that it is not easy to focus manually and hit the target. > Naively I thought that bright lens and shallow DOF would be helpful in > achieving precise focus, but I am going to be trying it myself when it > arrives. > > Thanks again! > > Boris > > >
I completely agree, Boris. Really can't tell anything from webpics. But don't forget, in low light, the acuity of your eyesight drops off too, just like any lens wide open. So the brighter image balances out. I think you will enjoy your super K regardless, just like Timber is enjoying his Porst. D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
