Two comments gleaned from the list at Stan Halpin's lens comments site. Not very complementary but not the worst lens either. It takes a very special lens for Shel to be effusive and this isn't one of those...
http://stans-photography.info/LongComments.html#24-50%20mm%20f/4.0%20A Stan should really update this site, it's getting a bit dated, and it's still useful, (Better him than me doing it, that's for sure). Charles Robinson wrote: > Found one kinda cheap on Craigslist and I've already told the guy > "I'll take it!" because I seem to recall having read fairly > complimentary things about it on this list. Digging through the > archives, though, I'm wondering if I dreamed it as I'm not finding a > whole lot about it. > > As I'm about to hand over my DS (soon as it is back from repair) to my > daughter as a gift, I figure at the very least I could have that be > her "standard" lens since she loves manual focus and pretty much is > disdainful of autofocus lenses. But if it's a pile of junk I'll just > tell the seller to forget it. > > Opinions? > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > > > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
