I have several actually. I have a Sigma 90/2.8 in Minolta AF which is rated 4.2 by photodo. I have a manual Vivitar Series 1 105/2.5 which is rated almost as sharp and has less distortion I think and I have a Tamron 90/2.5 which I stick an ES adapter on for my screwmount collection. Too be honest almost everybody's macros are their best lenses so few are really bad. I would have no qualms using any of the Pentax ones, or the Sigma 105/2.8 EX, or the Tokina/Tamron ones either. Kent Gittings
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What Zoom? In a message dated 11/26/01 10:48:04 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Better > go for a really good 80-200/2.8 and get another lens for macro. > You're the second person to say that. You guys make so much sense on that question, answer this: what macro, what focal length? Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ********************************************************************** - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
