In his declining years Picasso would draw three sweeping lines on a 
napkin, sigh it and sell it for a million dollars.  A technique doesn't 
imply repetition, it implies repeatable results.  In Picasso's case a 
minimalist Piccaoest image and a large paycheck.  Pollack had a 
technique too also guaranteeing a consistent results.  ...and they're 
both dead, but you didn't get that...

Bob W wrote:
> Picasso never repeated himself, and his art is certainly not dead. I
> have an edition of his sketchbooks, plus several books of his drawings
> and paintings. What really stands out for me is the energetic
> creativity and constant change and experimentation, allied with
> astonishing discipline, single-mindedness, self-criticism and
> knowledge of art history. 
>
> I can thoroughly recommend the book "Je suis le cahier de Pablo
> Picasso" to anyone who is interested in seeing how he worked up his
> ideas into their final form. A visit to the Musee Picasso in Paris is
> also time well spent - not least because it is such a beautiful
> building.
>
> Bob
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
>> Behalf Of P. J. Alling
>> Sent: 24 March 2008 02:48
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: PESO 2008 - 46 - GDG
>>
>> Tell that to Picasso.  Oh, right...
>>
>> Bob W wrote:
>>     
>>> When it becomes repeatable the art is dead.
>>>
>>> Bob 
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
>>>> Behalf Of P. J. Alling
>>>> Sent: 23 March 2008 21:04
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> Subject: Re: PESO 2008 - 46 - GDG
>>>>
>>>> The question becomes is it repeatable.  If so a new art form is
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> born.
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> This was a mistake but I find it somewhat amusing ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://homepage.mac.com/godders/46-hideout.jpg
>>>>>> Where Flying Saucers Hide - Santa Cruz Wharf 2008
>>>>>> Olympus E-1 + ZD 50-200/2.8-3.5
>>>>>> ISO 100 @ f/7.1 @ 8.0 sec, fl=101mm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments and critique always appreciated. :-)
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> NEVER admit something was a mistake! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool photo.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> -- 
>>>> Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
>>>>    -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
>>>> above and follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>> -- 
>> Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
>>    -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
>> above and follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to