As a normal lens the FA 35 f2.0 would seem to be a better choice, it's a stop faster and about $300 less expensive, (and still available from places like B&H photo new), and I like a bit more working distance than a normal macro usually gives, so though I don't have one, the DFA 100mm seems to me to be a better choice for macro. On the other hand neither is a Limited.
Toine wrote: > I will have my first Limited in the very near future! Can't wait. > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://insomnia.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2008/03/da_35mmf28_macr.html >> >> Seems it boasts nice bokeh and AFAIR its price is very OK. >> It isn't much fast (2.8) but it is a normal lens (more or less as a >> 50mm on 35mm camera) on APS-C and provides direct 1:1 macro. >> >> Oh, it is a limited, too. >> >> -- >> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille >> ---------------------- >> Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... >> Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB >> Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
