This is much better than Version I, methinks, because the composition is stronger and the female isn't camouflaged.
I have always been intrigued by ducks as photo subjects, but have virtually no "keepers". For some reason they're tough to shoot. This is definitely a keeper. Rick --- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20ayoungmallardsfancy2.html > > http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20ayoungmallardsfancy2.html > > Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax F 70-210mm > f4.0~5.6 > > Note: I was going to subtitle this soft core duck > porn, but I figured a > some people wouldn't look... > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally > ignored. > > -- > Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... > -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
