So its not just me then. I thought so to. Dave
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:56 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to say I agree with the other comments, the grass seems to be in > perfect focus. > > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Or a decent shot with an imperfect lens. > > > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7147418 > > > > Two things here. > > First: I'm training Grace to be a placekicker in the NFL. Note the > > perfect form. Hand out for balance. Head down. She's a natural. > > > > Second: Shot this with the obviously defective DA* 16-50/2.8 . Looks > > okay, doesn't it? And most shots will. Real world shooting doesn't > > always reveal defects. But someday when shooting a nearly flat scene > > wide open, one side of the shot will be a bit soft. The lens costs > > far too much to tolerate that kind of performance. Sometimes it's > > good to test. But only rarely:-). > > Paul > > > > > > > -- > Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... > -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
