16-45 is not sealed at all. Good glass, but the build is rather light,
even for a higher-end consumer lens (My Nikon 24-85 AF-S is much
better built). Not what I'd call hearty and rugged, although not
fragile either.

-Adam

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Christine  Aguila
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does the 16-45 hold up in the rainy weather?  I think I read that it's
>  not weather-sealed.  Is that true?  I can't afford the DA*, but I do have a
>  serious cat's eye on the 16-45.  Would you guys rate it as hearty & rugged?
>  Cheers, Christine
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>  >I should add that the DA*16-50 is also much sharper at f4 than the 16-45.
>  >And the continuous autofocus seems to be better. That being said, the DA
>  >16-45 is a great lens for te money. I thought long and hard about going to
>  >the 16-50. I'll probably opt for the 60-250 as well.
>  > Paul
>  > -------------- Original message ----------------------
>  > From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >> I'm with you Jack.
>  >>
>  >> I love my 16-45 and will keep it.
>  >>
>  >> I want to look at the 60-250, and if performs well enough may make
>  >> that my horse camera.
>  >>
>  >> If not. i'll have to put up with that Nikon crap i have.:-)
>  >>
>  >> Dave
>  >>
>  >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> > Glad it's the extra stop you need. My speed needs are basically meant
>  >> >  by the 16~45 and I'll probably not trade up to the 16~50 just for its
>  >> >  AF technology. Also, I'm likely going to pick up the 60~250 when
>  >> >  available.
>  >> >  Hope the replacement continues to perform as is the case at this
>  >> > point.
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >  Jack
>  >> >  --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> >
>  >> >  > So far, I'd say that the difference is basically the extra stop and
>  >> >  > the USM focusing. Both are very sharp. But I need that extra stop
>  >> > for
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  > indoor events. When I shot a courthouse wedding and had to work
>  >> >  > without flash, I lost a few shots due to 1/15th second shutter
>  >> >  > speeds. At 1/30th, it would have been a piece of cake.
>  >> >  > Paul
>  >> >  > On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>  >> >  > > I think the lady in the foreground is trying to break up with the
>  >> >  > lady
>  >> >  > > facing her. ;-(
>  >> >  > > Will be interesting to read your 16~45 v 16~50 comments when
>  >> > you're
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  > > had
>  >> >  > > a chance to get a feel for same.
>  >> >  > >
>  >> >  > > Jack
>  >> >  > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> >  > >
>  >> >  > >> My replacement DA* 16-50 arrived today. The focal plane is
>  >> >  > uniform,
>  >> >  > >> and doesn't appear to have any backfocus or frontfocus problems.
>  >> >  > I'm
>  >> >  > >>
>  >> >  > >> pleased. Took it to the coffee shop and snapped these ladies. The
>  >> >  > >> woman in the background was trying to sell something to the woman
>  >> >  > in
>  >> >  > >>
>  >> >  > >> the foreground.  19mm, f7.1 at 1/60th.
>  >> >  > >>
>  >> >  > >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7152702
>  >> >  > >>
>  >> >  > >> --
>  >> >  > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  >> >  > >> [email protected]
>  >> >  > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  >> >  > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
>  >> > above
>  >> >  > >> and follow the directions.
>  >> >  > >>
>  >> >  > >
>  >> >  > >
>  >> >  > > __________________________________________________
>  >> >  > > Do You Yahoo!?
>  >> >  > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>  >> >  > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>  >> >  > >
>  >> >  > > --
>  >> >  > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  >> >  > > [email protected]
>  >> >  > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  >> >  > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  > > and follow the directions.
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  > --
>  >> >  > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  >> >  > [email protected]
>  >> >  > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  >> >  > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>  >> >  > and follow the directions.
>  >> >  >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >  __________________________________________________
>  >> >  Do You Yahoo!?
>  >> >  Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>  >> >  http://mail.yahoo.com
>  >> >
>  >> >  --
>  >> >  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  >> >  [email protected]
>  >> >  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  >> >  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>  >> > follow
>  >> the directions.
>  >> >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> --
>  >> Equine Photography
>  >> www.caughtinmotion.com
>  >> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
>  >> Ontario Canada
>  >>
>  >> --
>  >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  >> [email protected]
>  >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>  >> follow
>  >> the directions.
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  > [email protected]
>  > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>  > follow the directions.
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>
>
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  [email protected]
>  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to