Agreed - color is the best, this time. -p
Bob Sullivan wrote: > Frank, > She's a prettier woman in color. The B&W doesn't do justice to her > skin tones - or hair as you mentioned. > Regards, Bob S. > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:32 AM, frank theriault > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> You certainly hit the exposure and her bright expression. >>> Very well caught. >>> Prefer the color. >> Thanks, Jack. >> >> Here's the B&W (since you've expressed a preference, it might help to >> see it...<g>) >> >> http://tinyurl.com/3k7fjx >> >> http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SAS3eRLsd9I/AAAAAAAAB2Q/kTuaJKkhb_U/s1600-h/apr_15_08+003.jpg >> >> I like the timeless look to the B&W one - were it not for the >> ball-headed mike, it could have been taken in the 40's or 50's. >> >> What I don't like about the B&W version is that I couldn't get any >> detail at all in her hair, and there's lots of detail in the colour >> version. >> >> Thanks for your comment! >> >> >> cheers, >> frank >> >> -- >> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
