Although you might want a USM lens some day, and it would be nice to  
be sure that your K10D was updated for them. However, if it wasn't a  
very early production camera, you're probably okay. After wading  
through a lot of mindless babble on the Pentax forum, I've been able  
to determine with fair certainty that Pentax does have a "revision"  
that has to be applied to early cameras to make them focus accurately  
with USM lenses.
Pentax

On May 6, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Cory Waters wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> My K10D is on its way to Pentax Service in Colorado. I tested it
>> today with the DA* lenses, which work great on my K20D. Not even
>> close. It backfocuses by anywhere from two dentimeters to ten
>> centimeters, depending on the focal length and lens.(That's
>> centimeters, not millimeters.) I had heard that early K10Dx required
>> a revision to work with the DA* lenses. Mind was ordered on day one,
>> so it's definitely an early camera. It had also become stuck in  
>> multi-
>> image mode. It couldn't be switched back to single image. I could
>> have lived with that, but not with the DA* focus problem. I have to
>> be able to use it with one or the other of those lenses when shooting
>> events with two cameras. It focuses quite nicely with all of my other
>> autofocus lenses. Seems to be a problem relative to the in-lens
>> ultrasonic motor operation.
>> Paul
>>
>>
> I'm beginning to think it may be a good thing that I can't afford the
> DA* lenses...
> CW
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to