Don't count on a thousand years, or even a few hundred for any modern medium. If you want you pictures to last use glass plates.
Michael S. Keller wrote: > Yeah, I'm kinda there. I hate to see analog go completely away, though. > <ego>Someone might consider my pictures worthwhile, in a few hundred or > thousand years.</ego> Despite my fond nostalgia for the MX I so wanted > when they were new on the market, I'm just not sure that I want to go > there again. If my SO also shows interest, maybe, and I still have some > of the darkroom equipment. I'm pretty sure a K20D is in my future, though. > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> I'm sorry. Didn't mean to be arrogant, but sometimes I am without >> trying:-). I did the same thing as a teenager. I thought this was >> your plan going forward. But, seriously, if the result is your >> motivation rather than the process, digital BW is very nice. And very >> controllable. >> Paul >> On May 6, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Michael S. Keller wrote: >> >>> Thanks? I was a teenager, with limited funds. One did what one >>> could. At >>> least I had an SLR for shooting said film, and an eagerness to >>> experiment. >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> No, you shouldn't care. >>>> Given the darkroom technique you describe, you'll get much better >>>> results shooting BW on a digital Pentax. >>>> Paul >>>> >>> -- >>> -Michael >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>> and follow the directions. >>> >> > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
