Hi, On 30 Nov 2001 at 10:04, Kent Gittings wrote: > In my opinion at least Outlook tends to be more intuitive than using > the Netscape email client.
But these are only two. Two of the most common ones, and obviously the ones the viruses and worms are tested on. Personally, I'm for Pegasus Mail, but there are lots of others... > I've used > other products over the years but most have some limitations and as a > result I tend to put up with the vulnerabilities. Which are limitations too... ;-) > And by the way my > wife's machine uses Netscape Communicator so it is not an Outlook > specific virus. As long as your machine is set to execute JavaScript > wise open it is vulnerable. True. HTML mail with embedded active or binary content will always be a risk. That's why I don't send HTML mail at all. For the scripted mails: has anybody ever seen anything really useful based on this feature? Gabor - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
