DagT, Beautiful photos. I agree on the 50/1.4, I found SR much useful too
On 5/8/08, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 23.11 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi: > > > > > On May 8, 2008, at 1:54 PM, DagT wrote: > > > >> Den 8. mai. 2008 kl. 22.43 skrev Cotty: > >> > >>> On 8/5/08, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>> > >>>> 7) Real Photographers don't use SR ;-) > >>> > >>> They use IS. > >> > >> In that case they need it, as they can´t get any lens faster than 2.0 > >> with IS, and nothing better than 2.8 if you don´t have a lot of > >> money .-) > > > > One hardly needs IS with lenses of f/2 and faster speed, at least if > > they're not 150mm or longer. > > One can't lift a 300mm f/2 lens anyway, so it will always be a tripod > > mounted lens and won't need IS either. > > I disagree, or at least I find SR to be very useful with shorter > lenses and wider apertures. My pug portrait last month was taken with > FA50mm @ 1:1.4, hand held at 1/30s. I also have sharp pictures taken > without a tripod with DA14mm @ 1/4s > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=336893 > and DA16-50 @ 16mm and 1/8s > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=353011 > > For me SR has been the most useful new feature since the image sensors. > > DagT > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
