As an addendum, I should add (I guess that's what you do in an addendum) a couple of
things:

Firstly, what I wrote in my previous post is my understanding of what the law is in
"Common Law" countries (ie:  Britain, the US, the Commonwealth countries).  It may be
way different in other jurisdictions.  BTW, it isn't a "legal opinion", it's just an
opinion.

Secondly, I'm not saying that anyone should refuse to co-operate with the cops.  I'm
just saying what I understand that they can legally do or not do.  In that situation
(where an officer demands my film), I'd probably co-operate myself.  Ending up with a
smashed camera, and having the officer say later, "I didn't do it, he must have
dropped it in the melee", doesn't suit me.

And third, I'm not saying that cops are all a bunch of jerks who illegally seize film
from poor photogs.  Some cops are jerks, just like some photographers are jerks.  No
more so, no less so.  And let's face it, officers have to work under extreme stress at
times, and sometimes make bad decisions at such times, just like all of us.  Problem
is, because of the large amount of power they have, when the police are jerks, it can
be a scary thing.  In my opinion, anyway...

And, last of all, matters of national security (referring to Brendan's experience) may
legally be different.  I could understand why Canada's Navy would be embarassed to
have anyone photographing those leaky buckets of bolts even in a peaceful situation.
I heard last week that there's a water shortage aboard our ships that are on their way
to Afghanistan.  I'm not sure if they've gotten there yet.  Sheesh, a water shortage
on a boat!  And, they haven't even started to fight yet!

regards,
frank - a Canuck and proud of it!



frank theriault wrote:

> Well, I don't know too much about the law, and how it pertains specifically to
> photographing "crime scenes", but I do know a little bit about criminal law.
>
> I don't know how photographing police officers at their work "impedes" anything.
> It may piss them off, but it doesn't impede them from carrying out thier duties -
> assuming that you're far enough away from the action that you're not physically
> impeding them from moving about.
>

--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it
is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to